Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
The report points out that in 2014, the global economy grew at 3 percent but energy-related carbon dioxide emissions stayed flat, the first time this has happened in 40 years. In that same year, renewables accounted for nearly half of all new power generation and the energy intensity of the global economy dropped by twice as much as it has on average annually over the past decade. How? Well, there is an ongoing revolution taking place in energy technology. Natural gas is better than coal, but its production, transport and use release significant amounts of methane, which has much worse effects on the climate than carbon dioxide. The good news is that serious studies have found that these emissions could be reduced relatively cheaply with new regulations. Krupp points out that if the same is done globally, that would have the same impact on the climate over the next 20 years as would shutting down 1,000 coal-fired power plants.
Trump on Syria: Knowledge-free foreign policy
Why I support the impeachment inquiry now
China’s grand parades might mask its weakness
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE