Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
The defense for Salim Ayyash, one of four accused of involvement in the 2005 bombing that killed former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri and 21 others, questioned prosecution witness Andrew Donaldson again regarding how he selected evidence to include in prosecution reports.Emile Aoun, lead defense counsel for Ayyash, referenced various witnesses who stated that they did not believe Ayyash used a mobile phone over a certain period when Donaldson suggested that, given the setting and local context, the information was not completely reliable. Aoun suggested that the prosecution had not only been overly selective of information, but had completely dropped the witness statements of some of Ayyash's family members because they were unsupportive of the prosecution case.
Anti-Syrian rhetoric not just Lebanese phenomenon
HRW warns Burj Hammoud landfill near capacity, advocates sorting at source
Cedars boycott averted after legal threat
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE